Venous disease and compression therapy
Intermittent pneumatic compression is prescribed for chronic venous insufficiency and for thrombosis prophylaxis, but its settings are chosen by convention rather than from any model of what happens inside the limb.
Which settings matter
We varied chamber number, hold time, maximum pressure and tissue stiffness across simplified and subject-specific geometries. Maximum compression pressure and hold duration govern venous flow, pressure and wall shear stress. Chamber count — the parameter most visible in product marketing — barely matters.
Tissue stiffness changes the response substantially: a compliant limb transmits more of the applied pressure to the vein than a stiff one. That argues for setting the device per patient rather than per protocol.
Making the analysis affordable
Answering these questions directly requires fluid–structure interaction between the flow and the deforming tissue, which takes hours per configuration and rules out a parametric study. The multi-fidelity coupling developed for this problem brings a full pulsatile cycle down to minutes while keeping flow-rate error under one percent, which is what made the parameter sweep possible.
Selected work
Computers in Biology and Medicine 212:111767
Annals of Biomedical Engineering