Aortic aneurysm
An aneurysm ruptures when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Clinical criteria use maximum diameter as a proxy, which misses the mechanics that actually decide.
Stress against strength
We propose a dimensionless stress-to-strength ratio that combines pulsatile loading with the local strength of the wall into a single number, evaluated over the whole surface rather than at one point. It was computed on 23 idealised aneurysm models spanning geometry, material properties and physiology, using one-way three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction.
The ratio identified every rupture-prone region, where conventional stress and strain measures found only some of them. Risk rises with thick intraluminal thrombus, with thin thrombus-free segments, with sagging thrombus, with higher blood pressure, with reduced wall thickness and with tissue softening.
Flow in the sac
Flow inside an aneurysm is not laminar and not fully turbulent. Reaching a converged phase-averaged solution takes many cycles, and reporting results before convergence is a common source of disagreement between studies. We quantified how many cycles are required and how the statistics converge, which sets a floor for any transitional aneurysm simulation.
Selected work
Stress-to-strength ratio for assessing rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysms: a computational study
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Efficient estimation of vessel wall stress under pulsatile hemodynamics via a snapshot-based coupling framework
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Convergence of phase-averaged, transitional flow in an abdominal aortic aneurysmal model
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 145(11):111007